Sunday, 16 December 2012

Genre Analysis

Hi guys,
Sorry I haven't posted in a while, I have been mega busy!
Clare and I have finally come up with a name for our film. It's called Open World.
We thought it is a appropriate title because it suggests that the world is falling apart.
We started filming our opening today (yay!) so hopefully I can post the film up on here soon.

Anyway, I had to analyse our film in terms of genre.
I hope it will be some use to you.

Open world-Film Language





In terms of genre, Open World is identified to be a post apocalyptic/mockumentary film. This is signified by the fact that the world is exposed to terrible things (e.g. global warming, carbon monoxide in the atmosphere), thus calling the film Open World. Mockumentary is present in this film by interviewing characters to give the audience an idea what has actually happened. There are many theories to how the apocalypse came to be. However, we do use the element of Deus ex Machina to the ending, which would make the audience more satisfied and comforted but we do not tie up all the loose ends. This gives hope to the characters futures and the audience can question how the world could recover. I believe that this is the best way to end a storyline because so many films end with every aspect of the plot sorted which I believe is overrated. I think it is healthy for audiences to make assumptions to a plot. This does not mean we would make a sequel.

This film is based on the common fear of our world ending unexpectedly. It is a great time to start this project because of the whole subject of the apocalypse starting on 21st December. The film is going to repeat again and again on the subject of how the apocalypse happened which will create fear amongst the audience. We use innovation of nuclear technology and we also use a resolution to round off the story. Our relationship with audiences will be strong because subjects like Global Warming can be related to. Also, the idea of humans trying to build a new civilisation is effective too as it brings some promise to the damaged world. Using techniques like handheld and whip pans to create tension, this fits perfectly with the genre. In terms of mise en scene, we set the opening in a deserted field which suggests the world is aliened because of the apocalypse.



Our ending appears to be slightly predictable because the audience are expecting that the characters escape. However, it does not fully cater for the audience’s expectations. Unlike most films, it does not tie up all the loose ends of the plot but would you want everything to be sorted out in a post apocalyptic film? It is quite unusual to do that. The film is not completely out casted in terms of familiarity. There is a happy ending, which is a very common element in films but the subject of how the apocalypse happened is unexpected. If the apocalypse did happen, would everyone in the world know how did happened? It would be unlikely. So, in a way by doing this the film is quite realistic. This allows our film to adapt to its genre instead of being fixed to one category. Without our film evolving, it would not seem as interesting and different compared to other post apocalyptic films. One could say that it is an independent film in the sense that it would have low production costs (just like a classic English film) but that is not a disadvantage. Low production films stand out of the crowd and with any luck, Open World will too.




 

Monday, 26 November 2012

Storyboard plan

1st frame = 10 seconds.
2nd frame = 5 seconds.
3rd frame = 15 seconds.
4th frame = 10-15 seconds.
5th frame = 5 seconds.
6th frame = 3 seconds.
7th frame = 25 - 30 seconds.
8th frame = 3 seconds.
9th frame = 3 seconds.

Film structure



The brothers – Nathan, possible hero, as he seeks to protect Joseph, then the baby. Joseph, possible helper, as he tries to protect Nathan and the baby by going into work hoping to not bring to attention that neither he nor Nathan are not “logged in”.

Unnamed baby – possible princess, not as a reward, but nevertheless needs protection from the villain – the officers – the hero looks after the baby.

Ruby – possible donor, as she gives Nathan the false I.Ds for him, the baby and Joseph.

Synopsis
The chaos of the apocalypse is shown by people running (this is evidence of a disequilibrium - Todorov), screaming – this is then mixed with news reports of warnings, political speeches and charts (this shows the cultural code - Barthes) that overall show a dangerously high increase of an “unknown” substance. There is then a blackout and a narrator talking about people being taken in and experimented on with radioactive and nuclear substances, the aims of these experiments, the controversy of the concepts etc etc (this shows a fusion of the enigma code and the cultural code - Barthes).

Shown to be six months after the apocalypse or “disaster” (this shows the enigma code, as the disaster remains anonymous - Barthes), the two brothers, Nathan and Joseph, are shown to be hiding in a WW2 bunker, as they would already have built in protection (this shows a new equilibrium from the disequilibrium of the anonymous disaster - Todorov). Tattoos are shown on their arms, which suggest that the brothers are part of a protester group (this shows an enigma code, as there is no further stated development of the tattoo - Barthes) – probably against the experiments that are suggested to be the cause of the apocalypse. Nathan is shown to be aware of what is happening around him, he constantly suggests leaving the bunker – this contrasts against Joseph, who is shown to still be very shaken by the apocalypse, nearing paranoia (possibly having post traumatic stress disorder).

Having been hiding in the bunker for six months, Nathan and Joseph have remained unaware about the creation of the work and life zones. The work zones are seen to be the debris left over from the apocalypse, it is seen to be the survivor’s job to clear it up to make for more life zones as there is a breeding program that has recently started. And so, the brothers do not know that their bunker, which is more or less in good condition, is part of the work zone and is planned to be destroyed.

A bulldozer starts to plough through the bunker’s thick exterior, the noise wakes up the brothers (this shows an action code - Barthes), who are then panicked because the bulldozer has cut off the electricity supply, therefore there is no lighting (to some extent, this may show a symbolic code, that the bulldozer may signify the effect that the apocalypse on the brothers - Barthes). They eventually find the door and escape, shocked to find nearly all the buildings that used to surround the bunker are now mostly turned to rubble. They hide for the night underneath an old bus shelter (this shows a slow resume to a new equilibrium from the disequilibrium of the bulldozer - Todorov). The next day, they see what seem to be workers walking into the wasteland, picking up rubble and taking pieces back to a pile – slowly clearing up the destruction.

Since they look to be wearing normal scruffy clothes, the brothers join them and successfully blend in (this further shows the new equilibrium - Todorov), copying the same actions as the workers. There, they notice the officers that watch the workers to make sure they behave appropriately e.g. not being rude to the officers (they constantly use the fact that they are being given a second chance to make things right, in their minds, this means a completely clean slate). Nathan and Joseph also notice that some who do not behave to the informally set rules are taken away for gossiped-about analysis (this shows the enigma code, as the analysis gives a strong, but mysterious, threat to all that have survived - Barthes), although the definition of the analysis is not said, there is a sense of fear and tension whenever this topic is raised amongst the workers and the officers (this suggests that there is a higher power than the officers and that the officers themselves are scared of the analysis).

A week later, keeping relatively quiet amongst the group of workers, sneaking out to stay at the bus shelter so the group of officers do not notice two extra people using precious supplies. The brothers hear crying from behind the bus shelter, similar to a baby’s (this shows the enigma code theory - Barthes). The brothers are initially cautious, as they think it could be a trick by one of the officers to catch any stray survivors for “analysis”. Eventually, the brothers find the source of the crying: a baby. It is wrapped in a blanket, the baby itself is relatively clean – Nathan suggests that this could mean that the baby wasn’t stranded too long ago, so maybe the baby’s parents are workers and/or officers.

Ruby, an officer, has been following the brothers for the past week, as she had recognised Joseph but not Nathan – she then bursts into the scene, pointing a gun at the brothers (this shows an action code - Barthes), revealing that she has the same tattoo as the brothers on her arm (this shows the symbolic code - Barthes), this suggests that she was in the same group as the brothers. She then sees the baby and puts the gun down, taking out a first aid kit from her jacket and seeing if the baby is hurt (this possibly shows a symbolic code - Barthes).

She is hostile towards the brothers, as she is somewhat shaken by seeing Joseph (she does not reveal that she knows him, but glances between the two suggest as such). She then explains to the brothers that she had to look after her sister’s baby after the sister was killed during the apocalypse (this shows an enigma code - Barthes). She finally reveals her name and agrees with the brothers that she will look after the baby if the brothers tell her everything they can about the protesting group e.g. if any of the members are still alive, if they believe in the cause anymore etc. She tells them to look after the baby for one night whilst she gets supplies to keep in a compartment in her office, whilst she is saying this she deliberately avoids Joseph’s gaze. She then gives them her first aid kit and leaves the bus shelter.

The next night, Ruby comes back to the bus shelter, telling the brothers she has the supplies in her office and asks them to cover her whilst she takes the baby to her office. Halfway through the procedure, they are ambushed by some of the officers suspicious of Ruby, trying to shoot them (this shows an action code - Barthes). Nathan is shot in the leg, once they make it back to the office – Ruby and Joseph remove the bullets and clean the wound – Nathan is too weak to make it back to the bus shelter and so sleeps in the office with Ruby, Joseph and the baby.

The next day, Joseph goes to clear up the work zone with the workers and intentionally spreads the rumour of the protesting group making a comeback, word spreads and he is arrested and taken in for “analysis”. He is then knocked unconsciousness, seeing visions of operations and blood on operating tools. Ruby then comes into the vision, talking to one of the other officers, seemingly giving a reason to not be analysed. The analysis then stops immediately, being stitched up. He then wakes up to see one of the other officers at the end of his stretcher, asking him questions about what life was like before the apocalypse, for no apparent reason (this shows the symbolic code theory - Barthes). The unnamed officer is then called away from the stretcher and Joseph walks around the hospital camp, finding Ruby in a corner, emotionless. She starts to talk about her sister and how she left her child for one moment, not being able to say anything else about what happened to it – this suggests that the child died.   

Joseph then walks away, remembering Ruby never had a sister. Back to Nathan at the office, he watches the baby sleeping, talking to himself about Joseph being taken away, he seems to pretend that the baby is replying to his questions. The unnamed officer then bursts into the office (this shows a fusion of the enigma code and the action code theory - Barthes), it becomes clear that the officer was called away from Joseph’s stretcher because of Nathan being heard talking to himself. The officer then sees the baby and talks to Nathan about how the baby is the officer’s property (this possibly relates to Levi Strauss's theory of binary opposites, whereas Nathan and Joseph feel morally obligated to care for the baby, the officer treats it coldly and says, essentially, that the baby is a piece of property), seeing as there has yet to be any answers about the baby’s biological parents.

Nathan then tells the officer that he’s Joseph’s brother – the officer then, without a word, walks him into his van, signalling to keep his head down past the armed officers who have been alerted about an unlogged person in the zone (this again uses a fusion of the enigma code and the action code - Barthes). The van is then stopped for checks, Ruby is the officer checking – she gives the all clear and a note to Nathan saying that Joseph has got supplies and is going to sneak into the life zones under another identity and that he has Nathan’s and the baby’s fake information with him, instructing Nathan to meet Joseph at the back of one of the life zone huts (this shows how Ruby is the donor in this story - Propp). The van drives on, going past some of the life zone huts, showing workers protesting against the officers, shouting the slogan shown in Nathan’s, Joseph’s and Ruby’s tattoo (this is another disequilibrium from the equilibrium of the work and life zones - Todorov).

Sunday, 25 November 2012

Film pitch feedback

Hi guys,
I have just checked the number of views is 116! Thank you so much for reading my posts. It really a lot to me, even though I'm one of millions of voices.

Anyway, Clare I had to do a pitch for our film for our media class and afterwards we had to put up what feedback we got from our classmates so I'm going to answer those questions now.

Ok, here we go:
Question 1: Because your film is in so much detail and it's of something so extreme, aren't you considered it is going to have a really high budget?

Well, we are only planning to do like the first 2 minutes of the opening and the location we are planning to use is a field with additional news headlines. So no, we are not worried about this film having a high budget as it probably won't have one.

Question 2: Where are you going to film all of this?

Again, mainly in a field and we won't film the whole two hours (come on, that would take like a year!) In additional, we will probably have to film it early in the day because the idea is that no one else is around except from the characters, which is about 15 of them.

Question 3: Aren't you worried of what Derren Brown has done and what is already out there?

Firstly, I haven't even seen Derren Brown's version of an apocalypse and secondly yes, there are a lot of films out there that are like this.
However, like Clare said at the time, we want to expose raw emotions to the audience, especially with the use of handheld and Steadicam work (we got a lot of inspiration from Cloverfield) and also for the
audience to sympathise with Joseph, who suffers from manic depression. O course we are also planning to use mockumentary features which hardly any films from this genre have used, like ever.

Question 4: How would you make the film fit into its genre well?

Well, mise en scene will definitely help with that e.g. torn clothes maybe burned a little and the newsflashes about global warming and the whole thing about work and life zones (which is quite like Mockingjay) and also the government testing nuclear on humans seem to cover that. In a way it is very political.

Question 5: What age rating would you give it?

A 15 because it won't be too gruesome but there might be swear words (come on, we are teenagers full of angst) and a few shots of blood, especially when Nathan gets shot.

Question 6: How long is it?

About 2 hours, a lot happens so we would really need that amount of time.

Here is the pod cast of it:
http://pixiem95.podomatic.com/entry/2013-05-07T11_37_01-07_00

Alright peeps, see you soon!

Emily x






Monday, 19 November 2012

Title sequences-use of sound

Hi guys,
it's getting really cold now and the darkness is started to get seriously hardcore :L kinda sad but it's nearly christmas (end my birthday! the 23rd)
Anyway, I learnt about title sequences in class. I watched the Kung Fu Panda title sequence and wrote about each transition of sound.

In general, the music is very Asian orientated e.g. use of the pentatonic scale and sequences. Asian non-diegetic music starts to signify the genre of film.  Also, a gong is played when the Dreamworks logo appears and sound effects are used to accentuate the fight scene between the Po and the bar animals. Also, folly is used when Po swallows and when a bull bangs his fist onto the table.

Most importantly, a voiceover is layered on top of all this to narrate the story.










My scanner is not working because for some reason it does not like my Open World sound diagram so I will just have to write a written response. 

For our film, we are planning to use a fast tempo for one of the tracks at the start with a relatively low volume. We are going to use two tracks and layer them to create a clash when a flash comes up which would only last for half a second. In the middle of our opening, we will layer a few voices over each other which  they would read the same narration: one person says about the scientists' theory then that would fade into religion's theory then into what everyone else thinks. Then this would end with all of them saying 'Who is to blame?' Then the same track that is used at the beginning will then be used when the title says 'Open World.'

Sunday, 11 November 2012

Film making is under way...

Hey guys,
Sorry I haven't posted in like a month even there is not many of you still I love you all for looking!

Anyway, here's me and my friend, Clare's film proposal. It's gonna be a post apocalyptic meets mockumentary film.
I can't wait to start filming!
Enjoy reading it and hope you guys have an amazing week!
E x


Media film proposal

Genre: Post-apocalyptic meets mockumentary.

Length: 2 hours (approximately)

Target audience: late teens to mid-fourties. Middle to higher class. Interested in philosophy and curiosity about structure of new societies.

Main Characters
Nathan – brother to Joseph, older than him.

Joseph – brother to Nathan, younger than him.

Unnamed baby – found by Nathan and Joseph in a secluded part of the work zone.

Ruby – officer of one of the work zones, looks after the baby whilst Nathan and Joseph are in the work zone.

Technique
Camerawork: a mix of handheld and Steadicam, this would give a documentary/homespun feel to the film. This would help to create a personal and realistic edge to the film, as the main benefit of using these techniques is that you nearly get point-of-view shots, not bird’s eye view shots.

Synopsis
The chaos of the apocalypse is shown by people running, screaming – this is then mixed with news reports of warnings, political speeches and charts that overall show a dangerously high increase of an “unknown” substance. There is then a blackout and a narrator talking about people being taken in and experimented on with radioactive and nuclear substances, the aims of these experiments, the controversy of the concepts etc etc.

Shown to be six months after the apocalypse or “disaster”, the two brothers, Nathan and Joseph, are shown to be hiding in a WW2 bunker, as they would already have built in protection. Tattoos are shown on their arms, which suggest that the brothers are part of a protester group – probably against the experiments that are suggested to be the cause of the apocalypse. Nathan is shown to be aware of what is happening around him, he constantly suggests leaving the bunker – this contrasts against Joseph, who is shown to still be very shaken by the apocalypse, nearing paranoia (possibly having post traumatic stress disorder).

Having been hiding in the bunker for six months, Nathan and Joseph have remained unaware about the creation of the work and life zones. The work zones are seen to be the debris left over from the apocalypse, it is seen to be the survivor’s job to clear it up to make for more life zones as there is a breeding program that has recently started. And so, the brothers do not know that their bunker, which is more or less in good condition, is part of the work zone and is planned to be destroyed.

A bulldozer starts to plough through the bunker’s thick exterior, the noise wakes up the brothers, who are then panicked because the bulldozer has cut off the electricity supply, therefore there is no lighting. They eventually find the door and escape, shocked to find nearly all the buildings that used to surround the bunker are now mostly turned to rubble. They hide for the night underneath an old bus shelter. The next day, they see what seem to be workers walking into the wasteland, picking up rubble and taking pieces back to a pile – slowly clearing up the destruction.

Since they look to be wearing normal scruffy clothes, the brothers join them and successfully blend in, copying the same actions as the workers. There, they notice the officers that watch the workers to make sure they behave appropriately e.g. not being rude to the officers (they constantly use the fact that they are being given a second chance to make things right, in their minds, this means a completely clean slate). Nathan and Joseph also notice that some who do not behave to the informally set rules are taken away for gossiped-about analysis, although the definition of the analysis is not said, there is a sense of fear and tension whenever this topic is raised amongst the workers and the officers (this suggests that there is a higher power than the officers and that the officers themselves are scared of the analysis).

A week later, keeping relatively quiet amongst the group of workers, sneaking out to stay at the bus shelter so the group of officers do not notice two extra people using precious supplies. The brothers hear crying from behind the bus shelter, similar to a baby’s. The brothers are initially cautious, as they think it could be a trick by one of the officers to catch any stray survivors for “analysis”. Eventually, the brothers find the source of the crying: a baby. It is wrapped in a blanket, the baby itself is relatively clean – Nathan suggests that this could mean that the baby wasn’t stranded too long ago, so maybe the baby’s parents are workers and/or officers.

Ruby, an officer, has been following the brothers for the past week, as she had recognised Joseph but not Nathan – she then bursts into the scene, pointing a gun at the brothers, revealing that she has the same tattoo as the brothers on her arm, this suggests that she was in the same group as the brothers. She then sees the baby and puts the gun down, taking out a first aid kit from her jacket and seeing if the baby is hurt.

She is hostile towards the brothers, as she is somewhat shaken by seeing Joseph (she does not reveal that she knows him, but glances between the two suggest as such). She then explains to the brothers that she had to look after her sister’s baby after the sister was killed during the apocalypse. She finally reveals her name and agrees with the brothers that she will look after the baby if the brothers tell her everything they can about the protesting group e.g. if any of the members are still alive, if they believe in the cause anymore etc. She tells them to look after the baby for one night whilst she gets supplies to keep in a compartment in her office, whilst she is saying this she deliberately avoids Joseph’s gaze. She then gives them her first aid kit and leaves the bus shelter.

The next night, Ruby comes back to the bus shelter, telling the brothers she has the supplies in her office and asks them to cover her whilst she takes the baby to her office. Halfway through the procedure, they are ambushed by some of the officers suspicious of Ruby, trying to shoot them. Nathan is shot in the leg, once they make it back to the office – Ruby and Joseph remove the bullets and clean the wound – Nathan is too weak to make it back to the bus shelter and so sleeps in the office with Ruby, Joseph and the baby.

The next day, Joseph goes to clear up the work zone with the workers and intentionally spreads the rumour of the protesting group making a comeback, word spreads and he is arrested and taken in for “analysis”. He is then knocked unconsciousness, seeing visions of operations and blood on operating tools. Ruby then comes into the vision, talking to one of the other officers, seemingly giving a reason to not be analysed. The analysis then stops immediately, being stitched up. He then wakes up to see one of the other officers at the end of his stretcher, asking him questions about what life was like before the apocalypse, for no apparent reason. The unnamed officer is then called away from the stretcher and Joseph walks around the hospital camp, finding Ruby in a corner, emotionless. She starts to talk about her sister and how she left her child for one moment, not being able to say anything else about what happened to it – this suggests that the child died.   

Joseph then walks away, remembering Ruby never had a sister. Back to Nathan at the office, he watches the baby sleeping, talking to himself about Joseph being taken away, he seems to pretend that the baby is replying to his questions. The unnamed officer then bursts into the office, it becomes clear that the officer was called away from Joseph’s stretcher because of Nathan being heard talking to himself. The officer then sees the baby and talks to Nathan about how the baby is the officer’s property, seeing as there has yet to be any answers about the baby’s biological parents.

Nathan then tells the officer that he’s Joseph’s brother – the officer then, without a word, walks him into his van, signalling to keep his head down past the armed officers who have been alerted about an unlogged person in the zone. The van is then stopped for checks, Ruby is the officer checking – she gives the all clear and a note to Nathan saying that Joseph has got supplies and is going to sneak into the life zones under another identity and that he has Nathan’s and the baby’s fake information with him, instructing Nathan to meet Joseph at the back of one of the life zone huts. The van drives on, going past some of the life zone huts, showing workers protesting against the officers, shouting the slogan shown in Nathan’s, Joseph’s and Ruby’s tattoo. 


Sunday, 28 October 2012

9 frames activity



We (Emily and Clare) chose these images because we had an idea to create an apocalyptic or post-apocalyptic (as these images could either be during the film or as an explanation leading to the current situation). We can base these images onto the opening title sequence for our film from Zixie Films.  
Whilst talking about the representation shown in the combination of these pictures, we had several ideas about the reasons, as shown by the first few pictures that would lead to desertion of the “open world”.

  • Over-population – not enough oxygen (also by deforestation) – combustion – oxygen mixing with carbon dioxide – carbon monoxide in atmosphere – carbon monoxide poisoning – masks etc.
  • Threat of nuclear war – people are quarantined and either killed off or taken underground to form new population (possible near-Nazi totalitarian underground state?)
  • Birth of new nuclear technology, to have possible positive effects on people with diseases – testing on humans – creates contagious disease – yada yada yada most people die.
  • Imposing threat of global warming – new last-chance government – segregation.  
  • Some people wake up from comas to find the destructed world, finding quarantine signs and body parts.

So despite our original ideas to create quirky individual films, we have taken some inspiration from The Road, Contagion and Children of Men to form ideas for post-apocalyptic films (which we actually rather like – who’da thunk it??)
                      

Sunday, 21 October 2012

TV Extract analysis




Hey guys, today I have analysed the first 5 minutes of casualty. 
From 00.36 to approx. 05.36





TV Extract analysis- Casualty

Camera shots and movements
This extract as a wide range of different shots and movements. This is because to create more panic and suspense, especially as most of it is set in a hospital. Panning movements are used quite a lot to establish a scene and to follow a character around. For example, right at the start of the extract, the scene is a established by panning from the shot of the reception desk to the front of it showing three of the characters.
A shot that is rarely used is the over the shoulder shot. In this extract, it is used to establish pride from the characters; when a carrot juice factory is in production and the owner and maybe the manager (does not really specify) look out onto this scene. Also, the dialogue helps to imply of this pride.

The Eye level shot is used a fair amount too to show a conversation between two characters. For example, at the start, the woman has a conversation to the man about going in the ambulance. The camera switches back and forth between the characters at an eye level height. The movement of zooming in and out is quite common to focus in on characters and out to the surroundings. The owner of the factory is shot from the front and the camera gradually zooms in. Another technique I noticed was focusing on the background and out of focusing the foreground. This is only used once when in the harvest festival rehearsal, the children look back at a photo with their friend, Bobby who is absent. This draws attention to the picture and emphasises on the children longing for him to be there.

The duration of the shots is normally shorter when dealing with a casualty. This is used when two characters are in the supermarket; the durations are long and this makes this part of the scene calm. However, when a shop assistant falls, the durations become quicker, creating more panic and suspense.

Mise en scene
This technique is not used very much but there are a few scenes that use it. Costumes and props are used in the factory production scene: like factory equipment, hair nets and white coats. Costumes and props are also used in the ambulance scene: fluorescent jackets, special emergency packs, portable loos and fake blood. The final example is in the house, the typical kitchen: table, clothes piled everywhere, woman dressed in casual clothes. Mise en scene helps to produce a scene to seem realistic which is definitely needed in this show because it’s a drama.

Editing
Two main techniques are used: 180 degree rule and match on action. The 180 degree rule is used to make the viewer only concentrate on the people in the shot which emphasises on the importance of the conversation. This is used at the start when the woman is explaining to the man about how he needs to help out in an ambulance.
This is also used when a meeting is shown between the carrot juice company and some investors. It does not show the rest of the room, making the side being focused important. Match on action is used in two scenes: in the hospital and the supermarket. When in the hospital scene, it’s used in a conversation between the man and the woman. It goes from an eye level shot to a group shot with the receptionist. This signifies that the receptionist is going to get involved in this conversation. In the supermarket, the women shop for lunch, having a conversation which darts back and forth between each other.

Sound
Ambient sound is used a good number of times to set the atmosphere of the location. For instance, hospital noises like the murmuring of voices are used. Another example is in the ambulance where the siren is used. Contrapuntal sound is used rarely, only in one scene. In the kitchen scene, the mother has an argument over the phone with her husband while happy music is being played on the radio. This signifies a sense of distortion of the mood of this scene which could confuse the viewer. And finally, sound bridge is used to link up two scenes with no bumps from the change of location. This is achieved by children singing the harvest song in school which is lengthened out to the next scene where Bobby is singing the same song. This connotes the sense of Bobby missing being at school.   

Hope this is helpful!
Emily x

Wednesday, 17 October 2012

Planning my preliminary task

It's been while you guys.
Sorry but I have been busy with coursework (as usual) and a recital assessment that lasted two hours O-o
Too long for my taste but it had to be done! (For Music A Level this is.)

Clare(My partner in crime) and I have been planning the structure of the preliminary task since last Thursday and we finally finished it today!!
Don't get me wrong, it wasn't the easiest 4 hours of my life but making a masterpiece never comes easy, especially when in the first two hours the camera kept running out of battery-blimen library camcorder :L and adding in extra features at the last minute (mainly Clare's ideas for in that respect).

We've got some awesome blobbers while filming, can't wait to edit it and piece it together!
It's gonna be LEGEND...wait for it ARY!

We also had to do a sound poster to learn more about we can in cooperate it into our film



And here's the film:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_MRzMyO1os


Have a wonderful evening
Emily x

Friday, 5 October 2012

I am still an amateur at this :L

Hey guys,
Seeing my recent blogs, looking at the date of when they were written you might be thinking,"Emily, how the hell are you able to write that many posts in like three hours?"

Well it's because of just learning how to use a blog that I accidentally made two blog accounts.
So I had to transfer some stuff to my original account.

Sorry about this, at least now I won't make the same mistake again, not!

I'm so clumsy
Emily x

Frames and semiotics

Hey guys, this is analysis is on last fortnight's episode of Doctor Who. I'm basically talking about the different shots and what they signify in terms of semiotics....





Enjoy!
Emily
x


Camera movements


Hi guys!
Today on this autumnal night, I'm going to talk you through the main camera movements used in the media and how they convey emotion and give a sense of character to the subject of the shot.
Just like what I did with the camera shots, I'm going to list 10 camera movements that are commonly used.

No.1- A panning shot
This shot this basically showing the camera moving from side to side (or up to down) slowly without the cameraman/woman actually moving him/herself; or as my media teacher put it, it's like holding a pan and turning with it!

I find it easier to do videos of each type of movement, just saying! This shot represents the location and the busyness of the place. In terms of character, it's kind of like it's from someone else's perspective, which gives  the atmosphere of that you are in the room!

No.2-A tracking shot
This is when the camera is on tracks to make the shot smooth and this makes the camera only able to move up and down along the ground.

This represents the feeling of being part of the scene and also really establishes the type of situation with the characters on vehicles but the camera not being the same.

No.3-A tilt up
When the camera starts from a low angle then tilts up towards the subject.

This really establishes different levels in the modern day world, like showing these stairs from this angle; they look more daunting than they actually are. I think it can be used on a subject to establish it's great importance to the scene or even to an entire film.

No.4-A tilt down shot
The opposite of no.3- where the camera is at a high angle then tilts down to the subject.

This represents the idea of a person looking up at the sky then down to ground level. This conveys of maybe a person getting used to the surroundings or even the camera trying to get the viewer/audience used to the landscape of the film/TV show.

No.5-A Dolly shot
I love the name of this movement! I think it's called a 'dolly' as it's kind of like being on a trolley- when the camera is on wheels and gives the effect of bumping against the ground unlike tracking.

Here, it represents the attitude a location, in this case a town full of people. This, like a lot of these movements establish the surroundings.

No.6-A whip shot
Basically the same as a panning shot. The difference is here is that the camera moves abruptly from side to side.

This represents the sheen panic on the crowd over what's happening in the situation. I have seen this film and if you haven't yet, watch it now! It's freakishly scary!

No.7-A handheld/steadicam shot
These two are basically the same, the only difference is the equipment used to create them. With handheld, it's just generally a camcorder but with a steadicam, the camera is attached with straps to the cameraman, like a rucksack on their chest.

 I'm basically going to use the previous video too since it has technique. It's quite shaky to imply of a more amateur like film which creates the overall sense of panic.

No.8-A crab shot
Similar to a dolly shot except that it's at a very low level.

Sorry guys but Youtube has nothing on this type of shot. Well, i'm gonna just improvise! ;)
It represents a location but not in our time, in a kind of slow motion.

No.9-Zoom in
You've guessed it, it's just focusing towards the subject.
I love this video! C'est magnifique! (Yes, I'm taking French for A level.) This represents the idea of how everything surrounding us is so much larger than as us as individuals and that everything is connected.

No.10-Zoom out
Opposite of zoom in, focusing from the subject to their surroundings

This represents the same aspects of the previous one, that so much is around us.


Yawn, time for bed.
Goodnight world!
Emily x

Camera shots and other methods


Hi again!
Today I had to learn about different camera shots and other features about filming e.g. camera angles.

So here are the 10 camera shots I learnt with pictures to explain:

1. Establishing shot- this is to set the location of a scene to lead the viewer or audience into the situation easily.


2. Next, the long shot- this usually includes a character in a certain location which is shown behind them. T suppose this gives the viewer or audience an idea of where the character is.


3. Full shot- basically shows the character profile; head and shoulders or sometimes it can show their whole body.



       







4. Medium shot- this is very similar to a full shot- it shows a character from their head to their torso. I suppose that this makes the audience focus more on that character even though the background is shown a bit behind them.


5. Close up- this shot focuses on the protagonist's face. This gives the audience to experience of what he or she (or even it!) is feeling.


6. Extreme close up- can be focusing on a person's facial features e.g. mouth. This makes the audience be able to dig deeper even more to discover what this individual is going through.


7. The 'American shot'- it's basically a medium shot that includes where (according to some sources) 'the guns are showing.' Typically used in Westerns to bring tension and making the audience ask 'What's going to happen next?'


8. Extreme long shot-very similar to the establishing and the long shot, setting the scene using a films landscape.


9. Master shot- a shot done in one continuous take and shows an entire scene with all the key elements. This makes the viewer or audience feel more aware of what's happening in the plot.


10. Two shot- this is framed to show two characters arranged symmetrically often facing each other.

Camera angles

1. Eye level- when the camera is posed as a character observing the scene. This makes the viewer or audience feel more connected and involved in the plot by the director using this method.


2. Low angle- when the camera is positioned to look up at the subject of the shot, maybe as a smaller person or a pedestrian tilting their head up to a building.


3. High angle- the opposite of a low angle. When the position of the camera is looking down on a character, like a taller person. I suppose this gives the audience or viewer how insignificant one person is in this world.


Thanks for reading and will update soon!

Emily x

Anchorage


As what I did for semiotics, I'm going to explain the term Anchorage. 

Anchorage is when the viewer (or the audience) is said to be 'all at sea' in a world of ideas and meanings, a media world in this sense.
There is no such thing as a fixed meaning. The best that a producer of a film/TV series/music artist/newspaper can do is to 'anchor' the viewer (or the audience) around preferred readings.
This is the process of anchorage. 

If you think about it metaphorically, when a boat drops an anchor into the sea bed, it doesn't stand still. This is because of the waves constantly moving, bouncing the little boat in the massive sea. So the boat is implying that it can never be tied down or 'fixed' on the sea bed, the sea bed symbolising the meanings and ideas of every individual in the world think.

For example, this picture anchors around the typical stereotypical French citizen that people who don't live in France generally see this type of image in their heads when the media mentions 'The French'.

Hope this is been useful for people do not get this term.
Peace out media lovers! ;)
Emily x

3 aims to make my preliminary task LEGEND wait for it...DARY!!!

You'll got to love Barney Stinson for that line! XD

Anyway, as most of you media studies students will know, in year 12 you have to do a preliminary task which is basically warming you up to the final filming assessment.

So, without further ado, let's go through the aims of this task.

1.Continuity editing (also called continuity system) which is a high standardised system of editing that is used a lot in TV and film. It aims to present a scene so that the editing is invisible (i.e not consciously noticed by the viewer/audience) and the viewer is never distracted by awkward jumps between shots or by awkward jumps between shots.

2. 180 degree rule- when the camera stays on only one side of the actions and objects in a scene. The invisible line (axis of action) run through the space of the scene.



3. Match on action- when the perspective of the camera changes and the scene continues to flow.




Hope this is helpful for students who didn't understand the techniques before!
See you guys later!
Emily x

Thursday, 4 October 2012

Semiotics


Semiotics basically means the system of signs which was a theory from Barthes in the 1950s and proved the difference between a signifier and something to be signified.
It also covers the conventions of culture and the amount of learning we have in these three categories: symbolic, iconic and indexical. It's easy to identify what symbolic is e.g. a cross which symbolises Christianity.  Iconic is an accurate representation of the real like a photo and indexical is the most complex. It means that something as more potential meanings like smoke can signify fire. Juxtaposition is used in this to signify and denote objects with certain things e.g. the colour yellow could signify the sun and it could denote temperature (being hot).

Hope that's quite a good explanation of semiotics for all you students studying or maybe will study media studies!

Love
Emily

Thursday, 27 September 2012

Semiotic analysis of film logos

Today I'm going to write about film production logos and what they siginify.

Film production logo No.1- Film4 productions
As many English citizens will know, Film4 productions have produced a wide range of British films and a few foreign features on the side. Before 1998, the company was known as Channel Four Productions.

The lettering and the border signifies it's part of channel 4 as the border forms a 4 and the digital age of when the company started. The background signifies danger, maybe to give the viewer the idea of action and risk in their films.

No.2-BBC Films

  This production has also funded lots of British films and a few american movies too. The foreground signifies the company's name- British Broadcasting company. The background signifies space and a kind of magical idea of the company.

No.3- Aardman Animations
Aardman Animations logo
An English Animation company what is ran by Nick Green.
The foreground signifies the creativeness of the company by using a stamp-like font and a star in the same kind of form. The backgrouind signifies pureness.

Thursday, 13 September 2012

Starting Sixth Form......seriously different to GCSE

I started Year 12 last thursday and it seems really different to the past 2 years...so far the work seems seriously hardcore compared to GCSE coursework! I can't believe only last year that having 13 exams over a period of a month was hard. I was so wrong. Now I'm getting headaches from learning so much but I suppose it's a good thing since it's getting my brain pumped.

Year 11s have no idea what's coming their way! They think that at GCSE you get bucket lots of homework a week...wait next year and your whole perspective will change.

Doing Media Studies feels oddly strange since it wasn't my first choice. I was trying to take Chemistry but the classes were too full and they thought I couldn't handle the coursework. However I'm DEFINITELY not saying that I regret chosing Media Studies. Some people think this subject (and General Studies) is really easy. Think again. There's a few things to get your head round like semiotics and how the media makes us believe things and how we are conditioned by society in certain ways. I find this really interesting.

I suppose this is connected to media, that America has made their version of skins! What the hell?! I love skins but why can't they just keep to original ideas.

Here's the ad for it, looks terrible!

Emily x